lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 16/29] memstick: jmb38x_ms: s/jmb38x_ms/j38ms/g
    From
    Date
    On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 08:58 -0700, Alex Dubov wrote:
    >
    > --- On Fri, 22/10/10, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > > From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
    > > Subject: [PATCH 16/29] memstick: jmb38x_ms: s/jmb38x_ms/j38ms/g
    > > To: "Alex Dubov" <oakad@yahoo.com>
    > > Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Maxim Levitsky" <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
    > > Received: Friday, 22 October, 2010, 4:53 PM
    > > This just makes it easier to type
    > > function names
    > > while still keeping the meaning
    > > Driver name and filenames are left unchanged.
    > >
    > >
    > > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
    > > ---
    >
    > What sort of patch/argument is this?
    > Function prefix should match the module name, to be immediately and
    > unambiguously identifiable in the stack trace.
    In that case maybe rename the module too?
    'jmb38x_ms' is just a mouthful as Andrew Morton would say.

    I mean if you really really dislike that, I could revert it, but for
    peoples sake, whats wrong with that?

    Best regards,
    Maxim Levitsky



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-10-26 04:15    [W:0.029 / U:0.220 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site