[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/29] memstick: core: add new functions
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 07:56 -0700, Alex Dubov wrote:
> --- On Fri, 22/10/10, Maxim Levitsky <> wrote:
> > From: Maxim Levitsky <>
> > Subject: [PATCH 03/29] memstick: core: add new functions
> > To: "Alex Dubov" <>
> > Cc: "Andrew Morton" <>, "LKML" <>, "Maxim Levitsky" <>
> > Received: Friday, 22 October, 2010, 4:53 PM
> > Add a lot of support code that will
> > be used later.
> >
> You're adding here a lot of temporarily dead code, which, while being
> useful, should be better added together with the actual driver
> functionality.
So what?
What is wrong with that?
Why should I mix things together?

> Besides this, the patch has a lot of unneeded clean-ups which are better
> be set as a separate patch.
What cleanups?
So I added the memstick_power_off and make code use it
If you want even that as separate patch, ok.

And memstick_invalidate_reg_window in memstick_power_on?
Again at any rate it will be invalid there.
(Maybe I should have put that in memstick_power_off actually, will do)

If you want me to put these changes in separate patches, ok, I do it.

> And it doesn't conform to the coding guideline either (4 byte indents,
> instead of tab
I checked the patch with It didn't complain.
I also use 8 byte tabs not 4.
Will look at that, thanks.

Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-10-26 03:23    [W:0.122 / U:14.264 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site