Messages in this thread | | | From | Gene Heskett <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.36, make oldconfig broken | Date | Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:18:38 -0400 |
| |
On Friday, October 22, 2010, Ken Moffat wrote: >On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 02:20:17PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 10/22/10 13:08, Gene Heskett wrote: >> > But I'll be interested in what you get. Its stuff like this that >> > have made me wary of downloading the kernel images in .bz2 formats, >> > too many times I have had to go back and get the .gz version because >> > the unpacking of the .bz2 upchucked and silently threw away a subdir >> > tree, and only a fresh download fixes it, blowing it away and >> > unpacking the bz2 again will only fix it occasionally. I started >> > with the tar.gz of course this time. >> >> Curiouser and curiouser. >> I always download & build from .bz2 tarballs, with no problems. > > On my own x86 machines, I can remember seeing apparently corrupted >.tar.bz2 files twice in the last eight-or-so years. In each case, >untarring reported an error, it didn't silently lose files and >directories, and in each case the problem was failing memory. > > In Gene's case, I recommend running memtest86 or better ('+') as >soon as possible. On my problematic x86 boxes, memtest86 started to >report errors within a minute or so of starting. If it runs for a >whole cycle, the memory is probably ok. > >ken
I haven't done that in 6 months or so, but will the next time I reboot. The last time I had any errors from memtest+ was about 18 months back, and a thorough re-seating of the memory seemed to fix it. Maybe its due again?
Thanks for the reminder Ken. One tends to 'get in a rut' in the later years, forgetting such.
I will report what happens when I do.
-- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) To the landlord belongs the doorknobs.
| |