lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rivafb: dubious assignment
On 10/22/2010 10:47 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 13:31, Nicolas Kaiser<nikai@nikai.net> wrote:
>> A duplicated assignment unconditionally changes max_gfsize to
>> GFIFO_SIZE.
>>
>> It looks to me like this might not be intended, or is it?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser<nikai@nikai.net>
>> ---
>> drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.c | 1 -
>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.c b/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.c
>> index 78fdbf5..936abfa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.c
>> @@ -263,7 +263,6 @@ static int nv3_iterate(nv3_fifo_info *res_info, nv3_sim_state * state, nv3_arb_i
>> vmisses = 2;
>> if (ainfo->gburst_size == 128) max_gfsize = GFIFO_SIZE_128;
>> else max_gfsize = GFIFO_SIZE;
>> - max_gfsize = GFIFO_SIZE;
>> while (1)
>> {
>> if (ainfo->vid_en)
>> --
>> 1.7.2.2
>
> According to full-history-linux, this comes from the initial drop in 2.3.49pre2,
> from nVidia code(?), imported by Jeff Garzik.

Yep, came straight from X.org driver code... Patch certainly looks
correct, but who knows but NV for sure :)




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-10-22 19:21    [W:0.043 / U:0.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site