Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] llseek conversion | Date | Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:18:36 +0200 |
| |
On Friday 22 October 2010 13:11:53 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:10:08PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > There are a few new drivers in linux-next that introduce additional > > file_operations. These can all use no_llseek and I can follow up > > with a patch to make that explicit when they get merged. > > I don't think there's any reason to make that explicit. In fact once > your transition has settled we can just kill no_llseek.
Fair enough.
I thought about leaving out all no_llseek instances right away, but I left them in because that allowed me to verify that my script actually caught every single instance.
Arnd
| |