Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:18:56 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Artem S. Tashkinov" <> | Subject | Re: On Linux numbering scheme |
| |
----- "Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Artem S. Tashkinov > <t.artem@lycos.com> wrote: > > What can you say about kernel 2.6.32? Almost nothing. > > > > What can you say about kernel 3.11.3? - it is the third release of > > Linux in 2011. > > And? What a useless information. > > BTW, it should be 3.2011.3, see Y2K.
Do you really believe Linux kernel will make it through 2100?
I bet by that time we will have some totally different hardware and software. Besides none of use will be alive by that time, so I don't see a problem. Besides, upon reaching 2100, if Linux still exists in its current form, the first digit could be increased to 4. :)
Best wishes,
Artem
| |