[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup the convoluted softirq tracepoints
    On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Steven Rostedt wrote:
    > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 21:49 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
    > Because you do the h - softvec in the tracepoint parameter? I got a
    > different result:

    I guess some serious whacking is due.

    The compiler adds two jumps when the parameter changes due to
    (h -softvec) instead of (h, softvec) ????

    Dude, you can't be serious.

    If you would have asked about the compiler version I'm using and told
    me about the compiler version you are using, then I could take that
    answer somehow serious.

    It still would miss the "Uhhhh, your compiler creates crap code"
    alert, because that double jump is seriously broken and braindead.

    And I tell you more about this. You are going to piss off a lot of
    users of distro compilers because they will set CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO
    happily and create the code I posted. Which will break the tracer no
    matter what.

    So you tracer maniacs happily played with some experimental compiler
    stuff w/o even testing your crap against something which ships with
    distros or is the reference 4.5 compiler on ?

    I prefer you sending a patch to disable this, until it's sorted out,
    unless you want me to add some really outrageous changelog to the
    patch I'm going to put into tip tomorrow night, ok ?



     \ /
      Last update: 2010-10-19 23:49    [W:0.022 / U:0.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site