Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:02:53 +0200 (CEST) | From | Julia Lawall <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use kasprintf |
| |
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Paulo Marques wrote:
> Julia Lawall wrote: > > These patches convert a sequence of kmalloc and memcpy to use kasprintf > > instead. > > Aren't these patches just a more convoluted way of doing a kstrdup? > > I would imagine that a kasprintf would make more sense when the format > string is more complex than "%s", or am I missing something?
They have all already been changed to either kmemdup or kstrdup.
thanks, julia
| |