lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 17/18] fs: icache remove inode_lock
    On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:21:31PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
    > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    >
    > All the functionality that the inode_lock protected has now been
    > wrapped up in new independent locks and/or functionality. Hence the
    > inode_lock does not serve a purpose any longer and hence can now be
    > removed.
    >
    > Based on work originally done by Nick Piggin.

    I don't really agree with how this is structured, doing lock splitups
    and changes and things under the inode_lock and then lifting it here.

    If nothing else, than the practical implication that any locking
    problem in the patchset is going to bisect down to this patch.

    My approach of being ultra conservative in the initial breaking steps,
    then removing inode_lock, then implementing more aggressive locking
    and less trivial transforms IMO is the better way to go. It has worked
    very well for me doing both the inode and the dcache work, and it has
    made it easy to understand and debug.




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-10-16 10:01    [W:0.020 / U:123.792 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site