Messages in this thread | | | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | Subject | Re: RFC: Implement hwpoison on free for soft offlining | Date | Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:15:32 +0900 (JST) |
| |
> > To me, it's no problem if this keep 64bit only. IOW, I only dislike to > > add 32bit page flags. > > > > Yeah, memory corruption is very crap and i think your effort has a lot > > of worth :) > > Thanks. > > > > > > > offtopic, I don't think CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE and CONFIG_HWPOISON_ON_FREE > > are symmetric nor easy understandable. can you please consider naming change? > > (example, CONFIG_HWPOISON/CONFIG_HWPOISON_ON_FREE, > > CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE/CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE_SOFT_OFFLINE) > > memory-failure was the old name before hwpoison as a term was invented > by Andrew. > > In theory it would make sense to rename everything to "hwpoison" now. > But I decided so far the disadvantages from breaking user configurations > and the impact from renaming files far outweight the small benefits > in clarity. > > So right now I prefer to keep the status quo, but name everything > new hwpoison.
ok. I've got it. thanks :)
| |