[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mm: handle_speculative_fault()
On 01/07/2010 12:36 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Right, supposing we can make this speculative fault stuff work, then we
>> can basically reduce the mmap_sem usage in fault to:
>> - allocating new page tables
>> - extending the growable vmas
>> And do everything else without holding it, including zeroing and IO.
> Well, I have yet to hear a realistic scenario of _how_ to do it all
> speculatively in the first place, at least not without horribly subtle
> complexity issues. So I'd really rather see how far we can possibly get by
> just improving mmap_sem.

I would like to second this sentiment. I am trying to make the
anon_vma and rmap bits more scalable for multi-process server
workloads and it is quite worrying how complex locking already

All rights reversed.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-08 00:55    [W:0.107 / U:9.444 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site