[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 6/6] x86: cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Anton Blanchard wrote:

> I wasn't using the example to strengthen the case of the -1 behaviour, but to
> highlight that a complete fix would be more work and risk not making it back
> to -stable.

I don't think that we should defer a complete fix to the callers because
it's "more work." If you've identified places where -1 is passed to
cpumask_of_node() without being checked, I think those would be fairly
obvious -stable candidates themselves instead of this series.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-07 01:29    [W:0.052 / U:1.116 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site