[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: lockdep: inconsistent lock state
    On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 08:27:00AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
    > This is the usual false positive that is detected - XFS takes locks in
    > reclaim that it also takes in non-reclaim paths. The reclaim path
    > from kswapd inverts lock ordering and so we get this report. This
    > case has never been a deadlock case because an inode in reclaim
    > cannot be referenced by any other path, so once again it is a
    > false positive....

    This should be gone in 2.6.33-rc as we now tell lockdep about resetting
    the dependency graph for the iolock once entering the inode reclaim path.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-01-06 18:39    [W:0.018 / U:38.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site