Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mm: handle_speculative_fault() | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:35:21 +0100 |
| |
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 15:09 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Couldn't we synchronize rcu in that cases(munmap, exit and so on)? > It can delay munap and exit but it would be better than handling them by more > complicated things, I think. And both cases aren't often cases so we > can achieve advantage than disadvantage?
Sadly there are programs that mmap()/munmap() at a staggering rate (clamav comes to mind), so munmap() performance is important too.
| |