lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [stable] [Bug #14630] sched_rt_periodic_timer vs cpu hotplug
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 10:59:37AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:29:46PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:36:59PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 16:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
> > > > >
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
> > > > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14630
> > > > > Subject : sched_rt_periodic_timer vs cpu hotplug
> > > > > Submitter : Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> > > > > Date : 2009-11-11 10:18 (49 days old)
> > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125793470309588&w=4
> > > > > Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/60250/
> > > >
> > > > git branch -a --contains 047106ad
> > > >
> > > > seems to suggest that this made it to Linus' tree.
> > >
> > > Any chance to get this into -stable? Since it seems it got only merged
> > > after 2.6.32.
> >
> > Can you please send a notification to stable@kernel.org (CC to Greg KH perhaps)?
>
> Sure, here we go ;)

Now queued up, thanks for letting me know.

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-05 00:19    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans