[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
On 01/25/2010 06:17 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 10:06 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 01/25/2010 07:22 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> In arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c, per_cpu(exception_stacks, cpu) is
>>> replaced with &per_cpu(exception_stacks[0], cpu) which is equivalent
>>> except that it allows per_cpu() macro to correctly drop percpu
>>> designation during sparse pass.
>> Same comment as Frederic's about this... this kind of uglification
>> really is unacceptable and needs to be addressed.
> Hmm... I don't think it's too bad but if you don't like it that much,
> probably the right thing to do is just leave it there and let sparse
> whine about it. There are only three in-kernel instances at this
> point, so it's not that big a deal.

That would probably be my preference until it can be fixed in a better
way. If we paper it over now, it will be forgotten -- and then someone
will come along and cargo cult it for no good reason.


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-01 04:38    [W:0.048 / U:45.184 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site