Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:17:50 +1100 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: linux-next:als tree build failure |
| |
Hi Jonathan, Jean,
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:59:37 +0000 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > It does make sense to keep these two steps separate. Ah well, I guess any > work around would be a pretty terrible cludge. I'll roll these two patches > back together and otherwise we will end up with something even less coherent.
OK, thanks guys.
-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |