lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: infiniband limit of 32 cards per system?
* Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>:
>
> > If that enum is indeed the limiting factor, would someone
> > mind explaining (or pointing me at TFM ;) why it's limited
> > to 32 devices?
>
> That dates back to when device #s had 8 bits for major and 8
> bits for minor. We got one major assigned for IB, and had to
> split up the 256 minors that gave us among userspace verbs,
> management access, etc. And 32 seemed like a pretty reasonable
> limit for most uses.

Hm...

IB_UMAD_MAX_PORTS = 64,
IB_UMAD_MAJOR = 231,
IB_UMAD_MINOR_BASE = 0
register_chrdev_region(base_dev, IB_UMAD_MAX_PORTS * 2, "infiniband_mad");

IB_UVERBS_MAJOR = 231,
IB_UVERBS_BASE_MINOR = 192,
IB_UVERBS_MAX_DEVICES = 32
register_chrdev_region(IB_UVERBS_BASE_DEV, IB_UVERBS_MAX_DEVICES, "infiniband_verbs");

IB_UCM_MAJOR = 231,
IB_UCM_BASE_MINOR = 224,
IB_UCM_MAX_DEVICES = 32
register_chrdev_region(IB_UCM_BASE_DEV, IB_UCM_MAX_DEVICES, "infiniband_cm");

It looks like we have a hole from [128, 192).

Would it be something as simple as this?

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/uve
index 5f284ff..b9aa2b8 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
@@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");

enum {
IB_UVERBS_MAJOR = 231,
- IB_UVERBS_BASE_MINOR = 192,
- IB_UVERBS_MAX_DEVICES = 32
+ IB_UVERBS_BASE_MINOR = 128,
+ IB_UVERBS_MAX_DEVICES = 64
};

#define IB_UVERBS_BASE_DEV MKDEV(IB_UVERBS_MAJOR, IB_UVERBS_BASE_MINOR)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-26 23:05    [W:0.058 / U:2.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site