[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/12] perf lock: New subcommand "perf lock", for analyzing lock statistics
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 23:15 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> As Peter told, this patch series depends on lockdep.
> But, checking dependency and tracing lock events are
> essentially different things. So I think dividing these is possible.

Still you need quite a lot of instrumentation at the actual lock sites,
not something you'd want to have on your production machine.

> But, perf depends on debugfs.
> I don't know about production box well,
> does your production box turns on debugfs?
> It seems that debugfs is not a thing for production box...

debugfs isn't a problem to have.

> And I'm interesting in in-kernel histogram of locks.
> Is there requirement of it?
> I have some ideas (not done yet, completely).

No real concrete ideas yet.. One possibility is to add a range,
bucket_size tuple to perf_event_attr and store the histrogram in the
mmap() area instead of samples.

One difficulty is how to specify what to make that histogram over.

Anyway, its all open still..

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-25 15:51    [W:0.138 / U:2.088 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site