[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [stable] [00/29] stable review
    Thomas Gleixner wrote On 24-01-2010 18:29:
    > On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
    >> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:11:45 -0800 Greg KH <> wrote:
    >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the release.
    >>> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
    >>> this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
    >>> us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
    >>> to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
    >>> Responses should be made by Monday, January 24, 00:00:00 UTC.
    >>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
    >> will still contain the regression described in (for example)
    >> It's fixed with the below revert which has been in -mm (and only in
    >> -mm) for ten days.
    >> I don't what's going on - perhaps we're waiting for Thomas, and he's
    >> otherwise engaged. There's a fix in the lkml thread "Re: [RFC PATCH
    >> 0/4] clockevents: fix clockevent_devices list corruption after cpu
    >> hotplug" to which Thomas replied
    >> I just applied your patch, but kept the cpuweight check. This
    >> is the least intrusive solution for now. The logic needs an
    >> overhaul, but thats neither rc4 nor stable material"
    > Just sent the pull request for it. Sorry for the delay. The patch
    > needs to go into 32.6 as well.

    tick-internal.h should be included for this to fix build failure. Already included
    in 2.6.33 with 8e1a928a2ed7e8.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-01-25 09:45    [W:0.024 / U:0.588 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site