[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [stable] [00/29] stable review
Thomas Gleixner wrote On 24-01-2010 18:29:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:11:45 -0800 Greg KH <> wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the release.
>>> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
>>> this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
>>> us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
>>> to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
>>> Responses should be made by Monday, January 24, 00:00:00 UTC.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> will still contain the regression described in (for example)
>> It's fixed with the below revert which has been in -mm (and only in
>> -mm) for ten days.
>> I don't what's going on - perhaps we're waiting for Thomas, and he's
>> otherwise engaged. There's a fix in the lkml thread "Re: [RFC PATCH
>> 0/4] clockevents: fix clockevent_devices list corruption after cpu
>> hotplug" to which Thomas replied
>> I just applied your patch, but kept the cpuweight check. This
>> is the least intrusive solution for now. The logic needs an
>> overhaul, but thats neither rc4 nor stable material"
> Just sent the pull request for it. Sorry for the delay. The patch
> needs to go into 32.6 as well.

tick-internal.h should be included for this to fix build failure. Already included
in 2.6.33 with 8e1a928a2ed7e8.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-25 09:45    [W:0.101 / U:6.336 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site