[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
> > But in that case we should be able to disable the VT switch disable
> > path; we just have to check each driver as it's loaded.
> OK, what the right sequence of checks would be in that case and where to place
> them?

Why are we even driving a vt switch direct from the suspend/resume
logic ? The problem starts there. If it was being handled off the device
suspend/resume method then there wouldn't be a mess to start with ?

Start at the beginning

- Why do we switch to arbitarily chosen 'last vt'
- Why isn't vt related suspend/resume handled by the device


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-25 22:29    [W:0.068 / U:1.892 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site