[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf_events: improve x86 event scheduling (v5)
    On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:
    > On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 10:58 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
    >>  void hw_perf_enable(void)
    >>  {
    >> +               cpuc->n_added = 0;
    >> +               perf_events_lapic_init();
    > Just wondering, why do we need that lapic_init() there?
    I think I picked it up from x86_pmu_enable(). I don't think
    you necessarily need it here. Not clear to me why it was
    in x86_pmu_enable() to begin with.

    I will post a new version of the patch which fixes some bugs and
    also implements true fast path (reuse of previous assignment). It turned
    out, things were a bit more complicated than what I had in v5.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-01-21 11:45    [W:0.020 / U:36.384 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site