[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf_events: improve x86 event scheduling (v5)
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 10:58 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>  void hw_perf_enable(void)
>>  {
>> +               cpuc->n_added = 0;
>> +               perf_events_lapic_init();
> Just wondering, why do we need that lapic_init() there?
I think I picked it up from x86_pmu_enable(). I don't think
you necessarily need it here. Not clear to me why it was
in x86_pmu_enable() to begin with.

I will post a new version of the patch which fixes some bugs and
also implements true fast path (reuse of previous assignment). It turned
out, things were a bit more complicated than what I had in v5.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-21 11:45    [W:0.114 / U:14.732 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site