lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: what's up with "make -j N" output?
From
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:24:14PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
>> Script does effectively:
>>
>>       make -k -j5 &>1.log
>
> My automated builds effectively run a number of "make -j 1" builds in
> parallel so I get sane parsable and readable logs.

I do this too, still -j1 is waste of time if only one compile is running
for whatever reason.

> I don't think we give any guarantees for -j 2 or higher even though
> that would be highly desirable when things go wrong.

Meanwhile, bug dissapeared somewhere. :-\
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-20 10:57    [W:0.037 / U:0.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site