Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:53:16 +0200 | Subject | Re: what's up with "make -j N" output? | From | Alexey Dobriyan <> |
| |
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:24:14PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > >> Script does effectively: >> >> make -k -j5 &>1.log > > My automated builds effectively run a number of "make -j 1" builds in > parallel so I get sane parsable and readable logs.
I do this too, still -j1 is waste of time if only one compile is running for whatever reason.
> I don't think we give any guarantees for -j 2 or higher even though > that would be highly desirable when things go wrong.
Meanwhile, bug dissapeared somewhere. :-\ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |