[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: add utrace tree
Hi -

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 05:59:59PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> [...]
> > Including experimental code that is RFC and which is not certain to go
> > upstream is certainly not the purpose of linux-next though.
> Ingo is correct in what he says here. See the boilerplate:
> [...]
> Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
> to fetch)."
> I will remove this tree from linux-next tomorrow and wait until it is
> more ready for mainline inclusion.

Please reconsider. Ingo mistook what was being proposed. We request
merge/integration testing for just the set of patches posted
<>, which was in response to
peterz's earlier review comments, and none of which is labeled or
considered RFC or experimental.

Ananth was right that the utrace-ptrace git branch represents this
rather than master.

- FChE
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-20 14:27    [W:0.150 / U:1.652 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site