[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 32/40] async: introduce workqueue based alternative implementation
On 1/19/2010 16:19, Tejun Heo wrote:

> Yeah, you can flush individual works from other works and wqs from
> works running from different wqs. What's not allowed is flushing the
> wq a work is running on from the work. Let's say if the flush code
> can be modified to do so, would that change your opinion?

once you get "run in parallel, but have an API to wait on everyone who was scheduled before me"...
... that'd be fine ;)

but then you pretty much HAVE the cookie API, even if you don't have an actual cookie.
(just the cookie was an easy way to determine the "before me")

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-20 01:33    [W:0.121 / U:14.224 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site