[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer (UBP)
On 01/17/2010 04:52 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 16:39 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 01/15/2010 11:50 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> As previously stated, I think poking at a process's address space is an
>>> utter no-go.
>> Why not reserve an address space range for this, somewhere near the top
>> of memory? It doesn't have to be populated if it isn't used.
> Because I think poking at a process's address space like that is gross.

If it's reserved, it's no longer the process' address space.

> Also, if its fixed size you're imposing artificial limits on the number
> of possible probes.

Obviously we'll need a limit, a uprobe will also take kernel memory, we
can't allow people to exhaust it.

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-17 15:59    [W:0.116 / U:2.104 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site