[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer (UBP)
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 16:39 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 11:50 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > As previously stated, I think poking at a process's address space is an
> > utter no-go.
> >
> Why not reserve an address space range for this, somewhere near the top
> of memory? It doesn't have to be populated if it isn't used.

Because I think poking at a process's address space like that is gross.
Also, if its fixed size you're imposing artificial limits on the number
of possible probes.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-17 15:55    [W:0.144 / U:6.496 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site