[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: NCQ SSDs do not need read queue merging
On 01/10/2010 04:04 PM, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> NCQ SSDs' performances are not affected by
> distance of read requests, so there is no point in having
> overhead to merge such queues.
> Non-NCQ SSDs showed regression in some special cases, so
> they are ruled out by this patch.
> This patch intentionally doesn't affect writes, so
> it changes the queued[] field, to be indexed by
> READ/WRITE instead of SYNC/ASYNC, and only compute proximity
> for queues with WRITE requests.
> Signed-off-by: Corrado Zoccolo<>

That's not really true. Overhead always increases as the total number
of ATA commands issued increases.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-11 12:27    [W:0.086 / U:2.560 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site