lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1
From
Date
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 11:13 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:33 +0800, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 09:09 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 00:16 +0800, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > > > I've been all through it too, same result. The below may make a bit of
> > > > difference, but really has diddly spit to do with this oddity.
> > >
> > > I test this patch applied to 2.6.33-rc3, but no help on tbench
> > > regression.
> >
> > Did you try it with the vmark fix also applied? I would have expected
> > at least a _little_ improvement. (but then this regression _is_ a bit
> > odd anyway)
>
> I re-tested with both patches applied, but still no help.

OK, thanks.

> BTW, why do you call that patch "vmark" fix? :)
> I just wonder what "vmark" means.

Oh, that's volanomark. It put itself in directory vmark2.5.0.9, so it's
vmark ;-)

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-12 05:19    [W:0.040 / U:24.552 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site