Messages in this thread | | | From | Ben Hutchings <> | Date | Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:46:35 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix code patching for paravirt-alternatives on 486 |
| |
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 17:31 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: [...] > I'm wondering if it wouldn't be cleaner to fold the jump into > sync_core() and moving the sync_core() up before local_irq_restore().
Exactly as I suggested below the dashes. :-)
The only reason I didn't do that initially was that I don't know whether or not there's a good reason for the current placement of sync_core() after local_irq_restore().
Ben.
-- Ben Hutchings Who are all these weirdos? - David Bowie, about L-Space IRC channel #afp [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |