[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
On 09/08/2009 03:03 PM, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:13:34PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> despite the untranslated content, it is clear that you have scheduler
>>> delays (either due to scheduler bugs or cpu contention) of upto 68
>>> msecs... Second in line is your binary AMD graphics driver that is
>>> chewing up 14% of your total latency...
>> I've now used a correctly installed and up-to-date version of latencytop
>> and repeated the test. Also, I got rid of AMD's binary blob and used
>> kernel DRM drivers for my graphics card to throw fglrx out of the
>> equation (which btw didn't help; the exact same problems occur).
>> Here the result:
> This was with an unmodified 2.6.31-rcX kernel?

Yes (-rc9). I also tested with and getting the same results.

> Does Latencytop do anything useful on a BFS-patched kernel?

Nope. BFS does not support any form of tracing yet. latencytop runs
but only shows a blank list. All I can say is that a BFS patched kernel
with the same .config fixes all visible latency issues.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-08 23:31    [W:0.088 / U:6.680 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site