lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
On 09/08/2009 02:35 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
>
>> [...] That would mean that you (or anyone else with an interest of
>> tracking this down) would follow the examples given (by me and
>> others, like enabling desktop compositing, firing up mplayer with
>> a video and generally reproducing this using the quite detailed
>> steps I posted as a recipe).
>
> Could you follow up on Frederic's detailed tracing suggestions that
> would give us the source of the latency?

I've set it up and ran the tests now.


> ( Also, as per lkml etiquette, please try to keep the Cc: list
> intact when replying to emails. I missed your first reply
> that you un-Cc:-ed. )

Sorry for that.


> A quick look at the latencytop output suggests a scheduling latency.
> Could you send me the kernel .config that you are using?

That would be this one:

http://foss.math.aegean.gr/~realnc/kernel/config-2.6.31-rc9


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-08 21:09    [W:0.149 / U:1.536 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site