[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
    On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:13:34PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
    >> despite the untranslated content, it is clear that you have scheduler
    >> delays (either due to scheduler bugs or cpu contention) of upto 68
    >> msecs... Second in line is your binary AMD graphics driver that is
    >> chewing up 14% of your total latency...
    > I've now used a correctly installed and up-to-date version of latencytop
    > and repeated the test. Also, I got rid of AMD's binary blob and used
    > kernel DRM drivers for my graphics card to throw fglrx out of the
    > equation (which btw didn't help; the exact same problems occur).
    > Here the result:

    This was with an unmodified 2.6.31-rcX kernel? Does Latencytop do
    anything useful on a BFS-patched kernel?

    - Ted

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-09-08 14:05    [W:0.025 / U:21.624 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site