lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: checkpatch as a tool (was Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class)
On Tue 2009-09-22 18:11:39, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 18:01 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 17:51 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > I'll stop sending those
> > > emails if it's actually negative , but I don't think it is..
> >
> > Hi Daniel.
> >
> > I think it'd be more helpful if instead of merely sending
> > a "hah! checkpatch failure!" email you send the submitter
> > a gentler nudge and a fixed patch.
>
> I don't say "hah!" like I caught you or something .. I could try to
> soften the emails further so that's not the feeling .. As far as sending
> fixed patches to people it's not really feasible due to the number of
> patches I would have to send out.. The other issues is that if I send a

Well, so pick the worst offenders, only. That will also nicely reduce
ammount of distraction on the list.
Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-30 14:09    [W:0.109 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site