Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:06:35 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: checkpatch as a tool (was Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class) |
| |
On Tue 2009-09-22 18:11:39, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 18:01 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 17:51 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > I'll stop sending those > > > emails if it's actually negative , but I don't think it is.. > > > > Hi Daniel. > > > > I think it'd be more helpful if instead of merely sending > > a "hah! checkpatch failure!" email you send the submitter > > a gentler nudge and a fixed patch. > > I don't say "hah!" like I caught you or something .. I could try to > soften the emails further so that's not the feeling .. As far as sending > fixed patches to people it's not really feasible due to the number of > patches I would have to send out.. The other issues is that if I send a
Well, so pick the worst offenders, only. That will also nicely reduce ammount of distraction on the list. Pavel
-- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
| |