lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] slub: fix slab_pad_check() and SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 12:45:43PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > on a SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU cache, there is no need to try to optimize this
> > rcu_barrier() call, unless we want superfast reboot/halt sequences...
>
> I stilll think that the action to quiesce rcu is something that the caller
> of kmem_cache_destroy must take care of.

Why?

Thanx, Paul

> Could you split this into two patches: One that addresses the poison and
> another that deals with rcu?
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-03 17:09    [W:0.700 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site