lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/9] Simplify bound checks in capabilities for copy_from_user
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:55:49 +1000
Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Arjan van de Ven
> <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 7/9] Simplify bound checks in capabilities for
> > copy_from_user CC: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> >
> > The capabilities syscall has a copy_from_user() call where gcc
> > currently cannot prove to itself that the copy is always within
> > bounds.
> >
> > This patch adds a very explicity bound check to prove to gcc that
> > this copy_from_user cannot overflow its destination buffer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
> > index 4e17041..204f11f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/capability.c
> > +++ b/kernel/capability.c
> > @@ -238,7 +241,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capget, cap_user_header_t,
> > header, cap_user_data_t, dataptr) SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capset,
> > cap_user_header_t, header, const cap_user_data_t, data) {
> >        struct __user_cap_data_struct kdata[_KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S];
> > -       unsigned i, tocopy;
> > +       unsigned i, tocopy, copybytes;
> >        kernel_cap_t inheritable, permitted, effective;
> >        struct cred *new;
> >        int ret;
> > @@ -255,8 +258,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capset, cap_user_header_t,
> > header, const cap_user_data_t, data) if (pid != 0 && pid !=
> > task_pid_vnr(current)) return -EPERM;
> >
> > -       if (copy_from_user(&kdata, data,
> > -                          tocopy * sizeof(struct
> > __user_cap_data_struct)))
> > +       copybytes = tocopy * sizeof(struct __user_cap_data_struct);
> > +       if (copybytes > _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S)
> > +               return -EFAULT;
>
> This is broken, it breaks dbus at least for me. you compare bytes
> to u32s wrongly.
>
> Dave.

good point

From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] Simplify bound checks in capabilities for copy_from_user
CC: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

The capabilities syscall has a copy_from_user() call where gcc currently
cannot prove to itself that the copy is always within bounds.

This patch adds a very explicity bound check to prove to gcc that
this copy_from_user cannot overflow its destination buffer.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>

diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
index 4e17041..204f11f 100644
--- a/kernel/capability.c
+++ b/kernel/capability.c
@@ -238,7 +241,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capget, cap_user_header_t, header, cap_user_data_t, dataptr)
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capset, cap_user_header_t, header, const cap_user_data_t, data)
{
struct __user_cap_data_struct kdata[_KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S];
- unsigned i, tocopy;
+ unsigned i, tocopy, copybytes;
kernel_cap_t inheritable, permitted, effective;
struct cred *new;
int ret;
@@ -255,8 +258,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capset, cap_user_header_t, header, const cap_user_data_t, data)
if (pid != 0 && pid != task_pid_vnr(current))
return -EPERM;

- if (copy_from_user(&kdata, data,
- tocopy * sizeof(struct __user_cap_data_struct)))
+ copybytes = tocopy * sizeof(struct __user_cap_data_struct);
+ if (copybytes > sizeof(kdata))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if (copy_from_user(&kdata, data, copybytes))
return -EFAULT;

for (i = 0; i < tocopy; i++) {


--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-29 11:27    [W:0.833 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site