lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: EXT4 RAID read performance
From
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> You didn't say which version of the kernel you are using, which could
> be important when asking these sorts of questions about potential
> performance problems.
>
2.6.31

>
> Now, there are some workloads which compilebench might accurately
> model --- for example, tar'ing up a directory.  However, despite the
> name of the benchmark, it doesn't accurately model a kernel compile.
>

You are right. I created simple benchmark which does real compilation of kernel
with following results:

reiser3
16925 msec: tar xf /usr/src/linux.tar
119173 msec: make -j4 all

ext4
14296 msec: tar xf /usr/src/linux.tar
116692 msec: make -j4 all

btrfs
13493 msec: tar xf /usr/src/linux.tar
116015 msec: make -j4 all

MD RAID10-f2 with 256 kB chunk size was used in all cases.

Source code:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/fmikv7
It depends on Qt Core library. There are hard-coded paths.
It can delete important data if it is started without customization !!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-26 16:31    [W:0.213 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site