Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:27:46 +0200 | Subject | Re: EXT4 RAID read performance | From | wbrana@gmail ... |
| |
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote: > You didn't say which version of the kernel you are using, which could > be important when asking these sorts of questions about potential > performance problems. > 2.6.31
> > Now, there are some workloads which compilebench might accurately > model --- for example, tar'ing up a directory. However, despite the > name of the benchmark, it doesn't accurately model a kernel compile. >
You are right. I created simple benchmark which does real compilation of kernel with following results:
reiser3 16925 msec: tar xf /usr/src/linux.tar 119173 msec: make -j4 all
ext4 14296 msec: tar xf /usr/src/linux.tar 116692 msec: make -j4 all
btrfs 13493 msec: tar xf /usr/src/linux.tar 116015 msec: make -j4 all
MD RAID10-f2 with 256 kB chunk size was used in all cases.
Source code: http://www.sendspace.com/file/fmikv7 It depends on Qt Core library. There are hard-coded paths. It can delete important data if it is started without customization !!! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |