lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: massive_intr on CFS, BFS, and EDF
On 09/25/2009 04:37 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 15:31 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:

>> Do you allow oversubscription with EDF? It would seem so based on these
>> results. Would it maybe make sense to disallow oversubscription, or
>> make it an option?
>
> afaiu he doesn't, he simply splits the task's wcet between parent and
> child and (intends?) to feed back on child exit.

How does this work if we have one parent task that forks off a bunch of
kids like massive_intr? Does each child get half the bandwidth of the
previous child?

> oversubscribing edf isn't in general recommended, iirc u>1 gives
> unbounded latencies with edf.

Right...so would it perhaps be more interesting to try a modified test
where each child's bandwidth is equal and small enough that there is no
oversubscription?

Chris


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-26 00:51    [W:0.324 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site