Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:12:34 +0900 | From | Paul Mundt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] nommu: Correct is_vmamloc_or_module_addr() definition. |
| |
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:08:30PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:07:06 +0900 > Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote: > > > Commit 81ac3ad9061dd9cd490ee92f0c5316a14d77ce18 broke the nommu build > > due to is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() not being marked inline. Fix it up. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> > > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> > > > Ah, sorry. I think Andrew queues the same patch. > Ah, I'm too slow, David already caught it:
commit 934831d060ccd5471ecbc562804a8d3ccd6e562c Author: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Date: Thu Sep 24 12:33:32 2009 +0100
NOMMU: Fallback for is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() should be inline
The NOMMU fallback for is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() should be static inline, not just static, in linux/mm.h.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Sorry for the noise!
| |