Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:41:21 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: mailing list for trace users |
| |
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 21:59 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * John Kacur <jkacur@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Yikes - Ingo, I don't want to spawn a long thread here about what to > > > > call the list, but as a native English speaker, I think that > > > > "linux-trace-users" sounds much nicer than "linux-tracing-users". > > > > > > > > Perhaps, trace is an adjective describing the kind of users, in any > > > > case, it doesn't sound like "one trace" - so, could we go this one? > > > > (if you insist on linux-tracing then you have to drop the word > > > > "users") > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > That's funny, boast about my credentials as a native English speaker, > > > and then make a mistake. > > > > > > s/go this one/go with this one > > > > I hope you are right about linux-trace-users sounding better to native > > speakers than linux-tracing-users - because it sure sounds awful to me > > :-) > > > > Any other English native speakers with an opinion one way or another? > > Yes "linux-trace-users" sounds better, because it doesn't sound like > proper English. It sort of breaks it up "linux-trace ... users" gives > a ring of "linux tracing for users". > > But if you go with the more proper sounding 'linux-tracing-users" it > (to a native speaker) sounds more like a sentence, and my response is > "Oh God, Linux is now tracing its users, but I don't want to be > traced!". > > ;-)
Ok, i concur then :-)
Ingo
| |