lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject[RFC] Userspace RCU: (ab)using futexes to save cpu cycles and energy
Hi,

When implementing the call_rcu() "worker thread" in userspace, I ran
into the problem that it had to be woken up periodically to check if
there are any callbacks to execute. However, I easily imagine that this
does not fit well with the "green computing" definition.

Therefore, I've looked at ways to have the call_rcu() callers waking up
this worker thread when callbacks are enqueued. However, I don't want to
take any lock and the fast path (when no wake up is required) should not
cause any cache-line exchange.

Here are the primitives I've created. I'd like to have feedback on my
futex use, just to make sure I did not do any incorrect assumptions.

This could also be eventually used in the QSBR Userspace RCU quiescent
state and in mb/signal userspace RCU when exiting RCU read-side C.S. to
ensure synchronize_rcu() does not busy-wait for too long.

/*
* Wake-up any waiting defer thread. Called from many concurrent threads.
*/
static void wake_up_defer(void)
{
if (unlikely(atomic_read(&defer_thread_futex) == -1))
atomic_set(&defer_thread_futex, 0);
futex(&defer_thread_futex, FUTEX_WAKE,
0, NULL, NULL, 0);
}

/*
* Defer thread waiting. Single thread.
*/
static void wait_defer(void)
{
atomic_dec(&defer_thread_futex);
if (atomic_read(&defer_thread_futex) == -1)
futex(&defer_thread_futex, FUTEX_WAIT, -1,
NULL, NULL, 0);
}

Thanks,

Mathieu


--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-23 19:51    [W:0.286 / U:6.012 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site