lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] 2.6.31-rt11
Darren Hart wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> We are pleased to announce the next update to our new preempt-rt
>> series.
>>
>> - latencytop fix
>>
>> - disable SPARSE_IRQ, DMAR, IRQ_REMAP for -rt
>>
>> Known issues:
>> - ARM highmem
>> - scheduler load balancing oddities. Peter is working on it.
>> - timer_interrupt hang check (still working on somthing useful)
>>
>> The planned "add back MIPS support" is postponed to rt12.
>>
>> Download locations:
>>
>> http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/
>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/
>>
>> Git release branch:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git
>> rt/2.6.31
>> Git development branch:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git
>> rt/head
>>
>> Gitweb:
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=shortlog;h=rt/2.6.31
>>
>>
>> Information on the RT patch can be found at:
>>
>> http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
>>
>> to build the 2.6.31-rt11 tree, the following patches should be
>> applied:
>>
>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.31.tar.bz2
>>
>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.31-rt11.bz2
>>
>> Enjoy !
>>
>> tglx
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>> linux-rt-users" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> Hitting a repeating BUG at boot on my Thinkpad T60p:
>
> [ 2.861699] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> kernel/rtmutex.c:684
> [ 2.861839] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 777, name: sleep
> [ 2.861967] Pid: 777, comm: sleep Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-rt1-dvh01 #1
> [ 2.862092] Call Trace:
> [ 2.862217] [<c012d881>] __might_sleep+0xe1/0x100
> [ 2.862343] [<c056ccba>] rt_spin_lock+0x2a/0x70
> [ 2.862468] [<c018243a>] res_counter_uncharge+0x2a/0x50
> [ 2.862593] [<c01e6e23>] __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common+0x93/0x190
> [ 2.862720] [<c01e6fb8>] mem_cgroup_uncharge_page+0x28/0x30
> [ 2.862845] [<c01d6b87>] page_remove_rmap+0x47/0x50
> [ 2.862969] [<c01cf2d9>] unmap_vmas+0x349/0x6b0
> [ 2.863093] [<c01d45e5>] exit_mmap+0xc5/0x1c0
> [ 2.863217] [<c0140481>] mmput+0x51/0xc0
> [ 2.863339] [<c0146465>] exit_mm+0x105/0x140
> [ 2.863462] [<c01465b5>] do_exit+0x115/0x760
> [ 2.863584] [<c0146cc4>] sys_exit+0x14/0x20
> [ 2.863707] [<c0103025>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
> I'm looking for a problem with preempt_disable() between LinuxCon
> seesions now. But if someone already knows the problem, thought I'd post.
>

Ugh, nevermind, this was an -rc4 kernel. 2.6.31-rt11 does not see this
problem.


--
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-23 18:21    [W:0.395 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site