[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: checkpatch as a tool (was Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class)
    On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 18:01 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
    > On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 17:51 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
    > > I'll stop sending those
    > > emails if it's actually negative , but I don't think it is..
    > Hi Daniel.
    > I think it'd be more helpful if instead of merely sending
    > a "hah! checkpatch failure!" email you send the submitter
    > a gentler nudge and a fixed patch.

    I don't say "hah!" like I caught you or something .. I could try to
    soften the emails further so that's not the feeling .. As far as sending
    fixed patches to people it's not really feasible due to the number of
    patches I would have to send out.. The other issues is that if I send a
    corrected patch I could become responsible for that persons patch
    instead of them .. I could send out delta patches, however, I don't want
    people to rely on me to fix these issues.. Ideally people would correct
    them prior to sending the patches out..


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-09-23 03:15    [W:3.027 / U:0.408 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site