lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BUG 2.6.30+] e100 sometimes causes oops during resume
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:27:37AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday 17 September 2009, Graham, David wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > I guess the driver releases its DMA buffer during suspend and attempts to
> > > allocate it back on resume, which is not really smart (if that really is the
> > > case).

> > Yes, we free a 70KB block (0x80 by 0x230 bytes) on suspend and
> > reallocate on resume, and so that's an Order 5 request. It looks
> > symmetric, and hasn't changed for years. I don't think we are leaking
> > memory, which points back to that the memory is too fragmented to
> > satisfy the request.
> >
> > I also concur that Rafael's commit 6905b1f1 shouldn't change the logic
> > in the driver for systems with e100 (like yours Karol) that could
> > already sleep, and I don't see anything else in the driver that looks to
> > be relevant. I'm expecting that your test result without commit 6905b1f1
> > will still show the problem.
> >
> > So I wonder if this new issue may be triggered by some other change in
> > the memory subsystem ?

> I think so. There have been reports about order 2 allocations failing for
> 2.6.31, so it looks like newer kernels are more likely to expose such problems.
>
> Adding linux-mm to the CC list.

I've hit this bug 2 times since my last email. Is there anything I
could do?

Maybe I should revert following commits (chosen somewhat randomly)?

1. 49255c619fbd482d704289b5eb2795f8e3b7ff2e

2. dd5d241ea955006122d76af88af87de73fec25b4 - alters changes made by
commit above

Any ideas?

Thanks.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-23 01:37    [W:0.141 / U:1.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site