lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] a few writeback fixes
On Mon 21-09-09 14:56:20, Jens Axboe wrote:
Hi Jens,

> Jan, since we're not really sure on the inode wait yet, I dropped that
> patch. It's definitely something to look into, as are the congestion
> bits.
OK.

Honza

> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 1eea4fa..6bb510b 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -485,6 +485,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
> unsigned long bdi_thresh;
> unsigned long pages_written = 0;
> unsigned long write_chunk = sync_writeback_pages();
> + unsigned long pause = 1;
>
> struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
>
> @@ -561,7 +562,15 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
> if (pages_written >= write_chunk)
> break; /* We've done our duty */
>
> - schedule_timeout(1);
> + schedule_timeout_interruptible(pause);
> +
> + /*
> + * Increase the delay for each loop, up to our previous
> + * default of taking a 100ms nap.
> + */
> + pause <<= 1;
> + if (pause < HZ / 10)
> + pause = HZ / 10;
Isn't this check the other way around?

> }
>
> if (bdi_nr_reclaimable + bdi_nr_writeback < bdi_thresh &&

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-21 15:15    [W:0.043 / U:3.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site