lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [microblaze-uclinux] Re: =?us-ascii?Q?=5Bmicroblaze=2Duclinux=5D=20Re =3A=20=5BPATCH=5D=20Actually=20show=20KiB=20r =?us-ascii?Q?ather=3D20than=3D20pages=3D20in=3D20=3D22Fre
From
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:39:10PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:56:16AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> Greg Ungerer wrote:
> >>> Hi Lennart,
> >>>
> >>> Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >>>> Fix "Freeing initrd memory:" message on h3800, m68knommu and microblaze
> >>>> to show kilobytes as claimed rather than number of pages.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
> >>> Looks ok to me. I can take and push the m68knommu part separately.
> >>> Or if Andrew wants to take it all as one, here is an:
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
> >> As Greg wrote. It will be the best to push it separately. IMHO it
> >> will be faster. It is up to you. If you want to add it to microblaze
> >> branch please send only patch for microblaze.
> >>
> >> If not.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
> >
> > Oh right how silly of me. 3 seperate patches would have been nicer I
> > guess. The original code is certainly copied from one place to the others
> > although I have no idea which architecture was the first to get it wrong.
> >
> > Would everyone prefer I made 3 patches instead and resent them?
>
> Just do it for microblaze

Well I just sent a seperate one for each. I misspelled h8300 (as h3800)
in the comment before.

--
Len Sorensen


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-17 17:53    [W:0.567 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site