lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: 2.6.32 -mm merge plans
    On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 20:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:03:57 +0900 Paul Mundt wrote:
    >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:15:35PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    >> > mtd-make-onenand-genericc-more-generic.patch
    >> > mtd-nand-add-page-parameter-to-all-read_page-read_page_raw-apis.patch
    >> > mtd-nand-add-new-ecc-mode-ecc_hw_oob_first.patch
    >> > mtd-nand-davinci-add-4-bit-ecc-support-for-large-page-nand-chips.patch
    >> > mtd-nand-davinci-add-4-bit-ecc-support-for-large-page-nand-chips-update.patch
    >> > mtd-jffs2-fix-read-buffer-overflow.patch
    >> > mtd-prevent-a-read-from-eraseregions.patch
    >> > mtd-prevent-a-read-from-regions.patch
    >> > mtd-jedec_probe-fix-nec-upd29f064115-detection.patch
    >> > mtdpart-memory-accessor-interface-for-mtd-layer.patch
    >> >
    >> >   -> dwmw2
    >>
    >> Regarding mtd-make-onenand-genericc-more-generic.patch, I'm not really
    >> sure what happened. To recap:
    >>
    >> It was posted to the mtd list here:
    >>
    >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026805.html
    >>
    >> Kyungmin objected to the driver name change here:
    >>
    >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026807.html
    >>
    >> I pointed out that the rough rationale for the name change here:
    >>
    >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026808.html
    >>
    >> and offered to redo the patch keeping the old name if Kyungmin felt the
    >> rationale wasn't valid, but received no reply. Subsequently, Artem
    >> mentioned that he had merged it in to his l2-mtd-2.6.git tree here:
    >>
    >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026866.html
    >>
    >> which subsequently seems to not actually have happened.
    >>
    >> This is a pretty trivial patch, and I don't mind respinning it in
    >> whatever form folks are content with. I had assumed given the mention
    >> that it had been merged in to the l2 tree that the rationale was
    >> sufficient for merging.
    >
    > I don't think that Artem's tree is in linux-next, so I have no
    > visibility of what's happening with that patch.
    >
    > I do think that Artem's tree should be in linux-next.
    >
    > I guess I'll just hose the patch at dwmw2 and will see what happens.  I
    > sent it on Aug 6, with no effect.

    i guess i shouldnt try and bounce a few more mtd patches through you huh ...

    http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/vapier/blackfin.git;a=shortlog;h=for-mtd

    hopefully they make it in this cycle (they were posted a while ago to
    the mtd lists w/feedback addressed)
    -mike
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-09-16 05:53    [W:0.029 / U:60.584 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site