lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] libata: Add pata_atp867x driver for Artop/Acard ATP867X controllers
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/12/2009 04:59 AM, Jung-Ik (John) Lee wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
> Looks mostly reasonable to me, other than a few issues:
>
>> +static void atp867x_set_piomode(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device
>> *adev)
>> +{
>> +       struct ata_device *peer = ata_dev_pair(adev);
>> +       struct atp867x_priv *dp = ap->private_data;
>> +       u8 speed = adev->pio_mode;
>> +       struct ata_timing t, p;
>> +       int T, UT;
>> +       u8 b;
>> +
>> +       T = 1000000000 / 33333;
>> +       UT = T/4;
>> +
>> +       switch (speed) {
>> +       case XFER_PIO_4:
>> +       case XFER_PIO_3:
>> +       case XFER_PIO_2:
>> +       case XFER_PIO_1:
>> +       case XFER_PIO_0:
>> +       case XFER_PIO_SLOW:
>> +               break;
>> +       default:
>> +               printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: Unsupported speed %#x."
>> +                       " Default to XFER_PIO_0.\n", (unsigned)speed);
>> +               speed = XFER_PIO_0;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       ata_timing_compute(adev, speed,&t, T, UT);
>> +       if (peer&&  peer->pio_mode) {
>> +               ata_timing_compute(peer, peer->pio_mode,&p, T, UT);
>> +               ata_timing_merge(&p,&t,&t, ATA_TIMING_8BIT);
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       b = inb(dp->dma_mode);
>> +       if (adev->devno&  1)
>> +               b = (b&  ~ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_SLAVE_MASK);
>> +       else
>> +               b = (b&  ~ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_MASK);
>> +       outb(b, dp->dma_mode);
>> +
>> +#ifdef ATP867X_NO_HACK_PIOMODE
>> +       b = atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(t.active) |
>> +               atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(t.recover);
>> +#else
>> +       /*
>> +        * magic value that works (from doc 6.4, 6.6.9)
>> +        */
>> +       b = 0x31;
>> +#endif
>
> What's the purpose of this ifdef?

The magic value part must go. I'll update the patch.

>
>> +       if (dp->pci66mhz)
>> +               b += 0x10;
>> +
>> +       if (adev->devno&  1)
>> +               outb(b, dp->slave_piospd);
>> +       else
>> +               outb(b, dp->mstr_piospd);
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * use the same value for comand timing as for PIO timimg
>> +        */
>> +       outb(b, dp->eightb_piospd);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int atp867x_cable_detect(struct ata_port *ap)
>> +{
>> +       return ATA_CBL_PATA40_SHORT;
>> +}
>
> Doesn't the controller have a way to do proper 80-wire cable detection?

No programmatic way. libata.force should be used for other configurations.

Thanks,
-John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-13 02:19    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans