[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] tracing: add latency format to function_graph tracer
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:11:56AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 16:55 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Oh, BTW, what would you think about addding the current->lock_depth
> > in the latency format? That may help debug the bkl...
> Hmm, that would require adding another field for all traces. I don't
> want to increase the size of an entry unneeded. BTW, this is for all
> entries (even events).


> Ug! I just noticed that tgid was added to struct trace_entry, with the
> only user as the user stack entry. This should be in the user stack
> field not something that goes into every event!
> I guess I need to fix that too.
> Well, maybe replacing tgid with lock_depth may not be a bad idea after
> all.

Yeah, would be nice. This would be an interesting general purpose

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-11 17:21    [W:0.071 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site