[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
On 09/10/2009 09:08 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Nikos Chantziaras<> wrote:
>> With your version of latt.c, I get these results with 2.6-tip vs
>> 2.6.31-rc9-bfs:
>> (mainline)
>> Averages:
>> ------------------------------
>> Max 50 usec
>> Avg 12 usec
>> Stdev 3 usec
>> (BFS)
>> Averages:
>> ------------------------------
>> Max 474 usec
>> Avg 11 usec
>> Stdev 16 usec
>> However, the interactivity problems still remain. Does that mean
>> it's not a latency issue?
> It means that Jens's test-app, which demonstrated and helped us fix
> the issue for him does not help us fix it for you just yet.
> The "fluidity problem" you described might not be a classic latency
> issue per se (which latt.c measures), but a timeslicing / CPU time
> distribution problem.
> A slight shift in CPU time allocation can change the flow of tasks
> to result in a 'choppier' system.
> Have you tried, in addition of the granularity tweaks you've done,
> to renice mplayer either up or down? (or compiz and Xorg for that
> matter)

Yes. It seems to do what one would expect, but only if two separate
programs are competing for CPU time continuously. For example, when
running two glxgears instances, one with nice 0 the other with 19, the
first will report ~5000 FPS, the other ~1000. Renicing the second one
from 19 to 0, will result in both reporting ~3000. So nice values
obviously work in distributing CPU time. But the problem isn't the
available CPU time it seems since even if running glxgears nice -20, it
will still freeze during various other interactive taks (moving windows

> [...]
> # echo NO_NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS> /debug/sched_features
> Btw., NO_NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS is something that will turn the scheduler
> into a more classic fair scheduler (like BFS is too).

Setting NO_NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS (with everything else at default values)
pretty much solves all issues I raised in all my other posts! With this
setting, I can do "nice -n 19 make -j20" and still have a very smooth
desktop and watch a movie at the same time. Various other annoyances
(like the "logout/shutdown/restart" dialog of KDE not appearing at all
until the background fade-out effect has finished) are also gone. So
this seems to be the single most important setting that vastly improves
desktop behavior, at least here.

In fact, I liked this setting so much that I went to
kernel/sched_features.h of kernel (the kernel I use normally
right now) and set SCHED_FEAT(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS, 0) (default is 1) with
absolutely no other tweaks (like sched_latency_ns,
sched_wakeup_granularity_ns, etc.). It pretty much behaves like BFS now
from an interactivity point of view. But I've used it only for about an
hour or so, so I don't know if any ill effects will appear later on.

> NO_START_DEBIT might be another thing that improves (or worsens :-/)
> make -j type of kernel build workloads.

No effect with this one, at least not one I could observe.

I didn't have the opportunity yet to test and tweak all the other
various settings you listed, but I will try to do so as soon as possible.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-10 19:57    [W:0.214 / U:2.792 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site